SomaSimple Discussion Lists  

Go Back   SomaSimple Discussion Lists > Physiotherapy / Physical Therapy / Manual Therapy / Bodywork > Barrett's Forums > Range of Motion
Albums Quiz PubMed Gray's Anatomy Tags Online Journals Statistics

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2017, 01:54 PM   #1
Barrett Dorko
Writer and Clinician
 
Barrett Dorko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Age: 65
Posts: 23,531
Default Science Sunday III

The elimination of the scientific method has not been easy and it has taken a long time, but was the only way that a return to what I've called "the medieval mind" that has overwhelmed many in therapy was to take place.

Today, there is dry needling and "trigger" points to discuss - not that any discussion is permitted. Even the ideas around interpretation has been proposed by suggesting others read Why We Get Sick. "Evidence-based" is considered "gold" and science is used to sound "sciency" when describing things that go unexplained or confusing to many wonderful people.

There's a scene in North Dallas Forty that depicts a defensive lineman being injured (illegally) by a couple of players from the other team.

How has therapy followed this script?
__________________
Barrett L. Dorko

Last edited by Barrett Dorko; 02-07-2017 at 02:02 PM.
Barrett Dorko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 03:48 PM   #2
Barrett Dorko
Writer and Clinician
 
Barrett Dorko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Age: 65
Posts: 23,531
Default

Injury has been mentioned. Perhaps I should define that. Injury occurs when something requires "healing" or repair. Sometimes time is involved here. Any ideas here?

According to a prolific writer here, healing means "to make whole." Do you have a problem with that? Is science involved here?
__________________
Barrett L. Dorko
Barrett Dorko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 07:52 PM   #3
Ken Jakalski
Senior Member
 
Ken Jakalski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lisle, Illinois USA
Age: 66
Posts: 3,030
Default

Quote:
Injury has been mentioned. Perhaps I should define that. Injury occurs when something requires "healing" or repair
And this raises the issue of how and to what extent "repairs" need to be made.

For example, flexibility can have a negative impact on performance. Sue Falsone points this out in her analysis of what she learned working with a baseball pitcher. The athlete had a non-painful throwing elbow, but that elbow lacked 15 degrees of extension. She notes that nothing had happened and that the player hadn't injured himself, nor ever had surgery.

The first reaction, and I can understand it, would be to think this deficit may be performance limiting, but in reality, that lack of range in that athlete was an adaptive change. When with therapy that range improved to about seven degrees above neutral, that pitcher began having difficulty locating his fastball.

The analysis: he had gained enough range of motion in his elbow that is was changing his pitching release point and resulting in the ball coming out of his hand at a totally different angle.

So what happened? The trainers stopped doing all of the their manual interventions. but then he began to stiffen up. and did begin to experience pain. Why? His elbow was now lacking about 25 degrees of extension.

What happened next? They began working on his range of motion again, and noting that, at around 15 degrees short of elbow extension, he began to feel better.

The conclusion: That player needed that 15 degree elbow contracture. If he improved it, his performance suffered, and if it got worse he experienced pain. They determined that 15 degrees above neutral was needed to maintain what was his normal motion of the joint.

I guess "just right" is something we should have all learned from Goldilocks...
Ken Jakalski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 09:13 PM   #4
Barrett Dorko
Writer and Clinician
 
Barrett Dorko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Age: 65
Posts: 23,531
Default

Ken,

Improvement and correction are two terms I've used in the past. Reduction in discomfort seems too simplistic. Not sciency enough. After all, we're trying to sell something.

Repair doesn't always involve surgery, but it sure seems to have helped.

Goldilocks is a wonderful reference.

I wonder when it will be misunderstood or no longer known.
__________________
Barrett L. Dorko
Barrett Dorko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:06 PM   #5
smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Age: 60
Posts: 798
Default

The protective acclimatization you describe (15 degrees of flexion) in pitchers elbow points out, is this actually protective? Researchers (NSCA) are not sure, round shoulders for wrestlers too. Do we want to correct? Or leave alone?

Currently, for their weight training (athletes), is to not reinforce the mechanism (round shoulders). On the other hand, probably not try to correct the protective mechanism (round shoulders) either.
smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:55 PM   #6
Barrett Dorko
Writer and Clinician
 
Barrett Dorko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Age: 65
Posts: 23,531
Default

The difference between performance and appearance is often tricky.
__________________
Barrett L. Dorko
Barrett Dorko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 11:38 PM   #7
Barrett Dorko
Writer and Clinician
 
Barrett Dorko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Age: 65
Posts: 23,531
Default

By the way, I say that healing requires time, position and metabolic economy. I read that somewhere and I say that last one because it makes me sound smart.

The first is shortening more and more and the other two are almost or entirely invisible.

Aside from what I mentioned about healing, are there other requirements?
__________________
Barrett L. Dorko

Last edited by Barrett Dorko; 03-07-2017 at 12:13 PM.
Barrett Dorko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 01:02 PM   #8
Barrett Dorko
Writer and Clinician
 
Barrett Dorko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Age: 65
Posts: 23,531
Default

Many are certain about an opinion they believe in.

None of this follows the scientific process because in science all knowledge is provisional and an argument containing math (with "proofs") formed a basis for what was proposed. Prediction was given and "belief" might be affirmed but not given - until prediction was shown to be correct. If a "scientific" theory didn't predict something that didn't mean it was wrong. It simply hadn't included something or it had misinterpreted something. It can be way off, but if belief, certainty and opinion aren't involved, well, you know.

In your experience, has therapy followed this model?
__________________
Barrett L. Dorko
Barrett Dorko is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Random Sunday III Barrett Dorko Range of Motion 6 21-09-2015 06:25 AM
Science Sunday III Barrett Dorko Range of Motion 15 01-09-2014 10:36 PM
Sometimes Sunday III Barrett Dorko Range of Motion 1 22-12-2013 08:04 PM
Certain Sunday III Barrett Dorko Range of Motion 20 27-03-2013 11:50 AM
Novel Sunday III Barrett Dorko Range of Motion 8 02-06-2012 01:56 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SomaSimple 2004 - 2017